Live Action: Planned Parenthood Mammogram Lies Exposed
The left has been frantically pushing the spin regarding Planned Parenthood and the recent move to stop providing them with federal funding (from we, the taxpayers). Screeching things like “If you defund Planned Parenthood, women will die! They won’t be able to get mammograms. Why do you hate women and their girl bits?”
As many of us know, Planned Parenthood does not, nor have they ever, provided mammograms. That has not stopped them from outright lying about this in an attempt to scare people into giving them money:
“Most prominently, Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards recently appeared on The Joy Behar Show to oppose the Pence Amendment to end Planned Parenthood’s taxpayer subsidies, claiming, “If this bill ever becomes law, millions of women in this country are gonna lose their healthcare access–not to abortion services–to basic family planning, you know, mammograms.”
Oh really, Cecile Richards? Care to explain these videos taken by Live Action?
I won’t hold my breath.
—
Originally posted at That’s What She Said:
Jenny
Lori Ziganto
somegit
Snark And Boobs 
I could swear I saw her nose growing as she spoke. Who knew that another leftist organization would be headed by a liar and that with a straight face?
You can Parse this Farce, as its Logic Fallacies abound … the “piece” bolsters another “persuasive preponderance” of coordinated and integrated multi-media pretenses, which craft colourful and slanted slick content, advertising Planned Parenthood’s (PP’s) President, Cecile Richards — in all her primed “camera-ready resplendent magnificence” — expounding yet another branded iteration of psychobabble, gibberish and magnanimous grandiloquence that would foist PP, and her helmsman-ship tenure, upon the unwitting for another wastrel round. It rates as another blatant journalistic hatchet job and bloodied campaign. Summarily, Cecile’s rhetoric proffers tripe; namely, that she and PP ardently hone and responsibly deliver, singularly, as the only venue or option, provision of preventive health care to a staggering “…. 2.5 million women …”; specifically and predominately for …’err Birth Control. Hm. For starters, brutal logic holds that far less monetary outlay and far lower budgetary allocations … would yield vastly improved “rates of return”, so to speak, on investment capital ratios aka performance … Fewer poor persons’ babies [since, persons of means seek out other remedies] on a far humbler scale; suffice it to consider, the not so paternalistic, simple distribution of eg. $2.00 condom packets :: Thrift-is-Good; calculation … $293 | 70 MILLIONS; 97 percent … Net-of-net per-capital: WOW: What would Jane Hull think? However, comparatively, factored, that sum is paltry verses eg. the DoD tabs’ “lost” trillions to Black and Psy-Ops; par two? PP emerges, over its extended life-cycle, at best, as driven by a convoluted mixed-mission statement; it has targeted, tractable and traceable, tens of millions poor persons’ unborn babies. {In genetic |bio-engineering realms, life has been “initiated” in certain labs, using disparate admixtures | scenarios of substances: point zero is known!}. PP’s “legacy corpus ownership” measurement indicts it as a murderous, outrageously costly, population control organization … engaged, too, in grizzly and much documented covert recipient aka client experimentation. Historically, it embraces all manner of UN flag-waving Malthusians’, not-so-proverbial, New World Order agenda … Humanitarian Mimicry 101. So … what’s really up here?ABC, NBC, PP: what’s the difference? Get it?
Historically, PP embraces all manner of UN flag-waving Malthusians’, not-so-proverbial, New World Order agenda … Humanitarian Mimicry 101. So … what’s really up here? ABC, NBC, PP: what’s the difference? Get it? PS: According to PP’s own “charter” they are a “private non-USA-governmental org”: cute, right (?) aka an UN NWO…in lock-step organization, plain and simple. PP’s smoke and mirrors, “trend-setting media blitz”, spear-headed by its latest super-bleached blonde biker ésque pseudo Billy-Idol ‘cum Lady Diana ésque control freak…whose bizarro-world “stewardess/flight attendant of the century” appearance and deportment, smacks, somehow, oddly, as though her or “he” were emitted from the tail-end of a 747, no? All that make-up, and mask of artifice!
as though she or “he” were emitted from the tail-end of a 747, no? All that make-up, and mask of artifice!
“Psychobabble, gibberish and magnanimous grandiloquence” describes your writing style perfectly, Fallacies-Check..
I’ve heard of writers “dumbing it down” for their ignorant readers, but you actually “dumb it up”..
Oh, wait, you didn’t write those comments at all, did you?
It seems that you copied and pasted a comment from a “Cecil Rhodes-Moley” on the website “Muckety” word for word, but broke up that plagiarized comment into three separate comments here at Snark and Boobs…Nice job!
http://news.muckety.com/2011/04/09/remembering-ann-richards/31541