Skip to content

The Anti-Women Left Falls Back On Sexual Slurs And Dehumanization

October 9, 2010

Last week, I attended the Smart Girl Summit in Washington, D.C.  The conference was filled with women of strength, of brains, of beauty and of fierce resolve.  Women from all walks of life who came together, fighting and trying to do what is best for their children and this country.  But, I was struck by something else; to the Left, these women are either whores or some creepy new invention of faux women, worthy of only mocking and ridicule.

Many told of times where they had been, like I have, called “gender traitors” or not real women. I’ve been called a dumb tart, just a rack, and told “I have better meat for her mouth.” I’ve been accused of being a wholly owned subsidiary of male dominated culture, whatever that means. We dumb tarts can’t seem to figure out things like that.

Every woman I met laughed such things off. That part didn’t shock me. See, we don’t relish victim-hood. We are also secure and comfortable in our own skins, breasts and fancy wombs and all. But, another reason it is laughed off did bother me. Because we are “used to it.”  The thing is, we shouldn’t be. It shouldn’t be happening. Yet, it does. Over and over.

Kirsten Powers attended the panel I was on, called Feminism 2.0, the New Face of Feminism, with Jenn Q. Public and Pamela Gorman, moderated by Adrienne Royer. While Kirsten is an unabashed liberal and likely disagrees with us on most policy points, she listened and understood the vile hatred toward conservative women that comes out of the Left. Her article at the Daily Beast today reflects that. She touched on some examples, including the most recent one whereby Jerry Brown called Meg Whitman “a whore.”  She’s a dame, you see. Thus, anything concerning financial things, which women can’t possibly understand, is whore-y. Am I right, fellas?

Jerry Brown isn’t alone. And it isn’t just coming from men. Alleged feminists are some of the worst offenders, spewing sexist and outright misogynistic garbage at conservative women. Because, abortion. They have grossly tied up equality and “women’s rights” with a legal ability to kill your unborn children. Killing the unborn is a cause to them and women who dare to challenge them by pointing out the vile nature of such a thing must be gender traitors or dehumanized in any way possible. Kirsten Powers notes the following:

While we, sadly, are all too familiar with the casual misogynistic comment, what perhaps is more surprising is where these slurs lately have been coming from—progressive bastions like the Brown camp, and liberal women.

Last month, liberal talk show host Stephanie Miller laughed uproariously when a female guest on her show said that if she ever met Michelle Malkin, “I would kick [her] right in the nuts,” and warned, “Wear a cup, lady.”

Nice, huh? Stay classy, femisogynists! My only quibble is that it’s not surprising at all. The past year alone has shown that.

Gloria Steinem recently said conservative women cannot be Feminists. Cannot. Why? Because you are anti-woman if you are pro-life. Many other faux-feminists, or femisogynists, have been flapping their soy-drinking gums with outrageous, and shrieking, outrage in a similar vein. “Oh noes!” they say “Conservative women are trying to steal Feminism! They can’t be feminists. They are icky!” Um. Selective support for only “the right kind” of woman and slamming the doors you claim to open right in their faces is antithetical to actual feminism. Shatter that glass ceiling, but only if you do it by walking in lock-step with us!

Tina Brown, also from The Daily Beast, called GOP women winning some primaries “a blow to feminism”. You know, because they are meany pants and have cooties or something. Not real women.

But, actually, the only trouble with this one is, it almost feels as if all these women winning are kind of a blow to feminism. Because, each one of them, really, most of them, are, you know, very much, uh, uh, you know, against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time.

Yeah, no. They don’t fight against what I want and I happen to be a broad, Miss Brown. I also don’t think women are stupid and, therefore, should only focus on made-up, busy work issues like the nebulous “reproductive rights” and pyramid scheme, faux- environmental issues like the Left wants them to do. She then went onto say that it was even worse because they were rich women. Oh, well, rich women. They must not have enough estrogen or something. How could women be rich? That’s for boys!

This summer, a Democrat Congresswoman, Rep. Janis Sontany (D-TN) said about her Republican counterparts ““You have to lift their skirts to find out if they are women. You sure can’t find out by how they vote!” They can’t have girly bits, you see. If they were real women, they wouldn’t have strayed off the Democrat plantation! Somehow the idea that we only dress as women is a biggie with the Left. Trying to black-ball us from their exclusive, and kinda creepy, Stepford-Feminist club isn’t enough, you see. They have to try to dehumanize us to the point where even our gender is taken away from us. An article at Alternet said:

Sarah Palin’s Mama Grizzlies are merely the latest incarnation of the anti-women’s movement — a movement to oppose real solutions for women, dressed up in a skirt and lipstick, as if to legitimize their efforts to block progress.

The ever bitter and idiotic Eleanor Clift called Sarah Palin “Pat Buchanan in drag”. Salon said Sarah Palin “may be a lady, but she ain’t no woman.” Patricia Ireland of the National Organization of Women (should have “only our kind of” in front of Women) told Democrats to vote only for “authentic” female political candidates. And Naomi Wolf once said that Jeane Kilpatrick was “uninflected by the experiences of the female body.” To the Left, we are either not real women or we are whores, conservative porn, or sex objects with no brains because a woman can’t possibly have both. The response to the Citzen’s United movie about conservative women, Fire From the Heartland, put that on full and disgusting display.

Enough. We won’t take it lying down, despite the fact that Jerry Brown apparently believes we spend all our time on our backs.

So, no. I refuse to be “used to it.” And the Left should take note and remember that old adage about hell, scorned women and fury. Please do say hello to the scorned come November.


Cross-posted from NewsReal

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Julian permalink
    October 9, 2010 1:05 am

    You continue to amaze! Powerful, gutsy and carrying the articulate and cool-headed anger once exemplified by Wm. F. Buckley Jr. You do rock!

    But those libtards had better be careful throwing around phrases about dressing things up in skirts and lipstick; Barney Frank may be offended! And Rahm Emanuel might have a hissy fit!

  2. Molten permalink
    October 9, 2010 8:07 am


    I love how you say “Jerry Brown called Meg Whitman “a whore.””

    But when you click on the link you supplied, you find out that Jerry Brown did not call Meg Whitman “a whore.” An associate of Jerry Brown called Meg Whitman a whore.

    You may as well just say: “All dogs have four legs, my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.”

    If you really feel “scorned” by the left, Lori, then you are most certainly embracing a mentality of victimhood. Similar to the way that Sarah Palin and Christine O’Donnell cry about “character assasination” from the “lame stream media,” you’re all claiming to be victims of abuse from the dastardly “left”..

    Life is much easier when you have someone to blame, isn’t it?

    Jerry Brown didn’t actually call Meg Whitman a whore

  3. October 9, 2010 1:35 pm

    I think Rush Limbaugh is on target with this issue: the NOW crew is for LIBERAL women’s rights ONLY – they represent 15% of America ONLY. If you are a conservative woman (and God help you if you are a good looking, red-headed conservative woman – uhhhmmm) then you need to come to grips with being every bit the Neanderthal that we conservative men have been for decades. Their view of conservative women runs along the lines of derision for Wilma Flintstone. They all look like Rosy or Janeane and they all want someone to tell them they are beautiful and smart, when they are just mean, petty and ugly (in every shape of these terms). I was really upset when they backed the rapist in the Lewinsky case, but you are the scumbag that you are in this world and like AARP, they lost the legitimacy battle when it was time to step up for their signature cause.

  4. October 15, 2010 3:43 am

    no one has the right to call anyone such names or question their gender simply b/c they disagree with their politics. I happen to be a left leaning, pro-choice, tree-hugging old school feminist of the highest order and I am deeply disappointed that any woman would resort to such hurtful, counterproductive, and indeed dehumanizing slander of another woman; whether it be Sontany’s advocating of physically assaulting republican women voters (..”you’d have to lift their skirts…”) to one of your bloggers once commenting to the tune of something like..”Joy Behar makes me want to be a misogynist every time she opens her pie hole”. none of this is feminism whether it comes from left or right. I happen to disagree with 99% of the bs on your website however feminism is open to all women even when we disagree with one another. Personally, the issue that I have with many conservative folks is that although they already have the right to believe, teach their families, and live how ever they see fit, yet many still feel the need to school-yard bully (“hopey-changey” anyone?) and/or write more laws that simply impose their own values on those who do not hold the same values: anti-abortion laws, anti-gay marriage laws, no Islamic center in NYC, no teaching evolution, no comprehensive sex-ed in schools, Palin’s book-banning bender, “don’t retreat, reload..”, Arizona legalizing racial profiling, favoring deregulating big business which would only spell trouble for consumers and workers-ya know, “the little guy”..and the planet (think oilspills, deforestation, and industrial waste pollution), the ever-fading line between separation of church and state (despite that there are many, many different religions and faiths in this country and so far we’re all still allowed to worship or not worship how ever we choose), and this overwhelming appearance as though the dollar is more important than helping poor people, humanity, civility, in fact more important than anything (ahem, tea party) etc, etc. You gals on the right are some tough fighters and for better or worse, these are some exciting and interesting times, politically speaking. I think the squabbling, hair-pulling, put downs, and pettiness on both sides needs to be put to rest. We’re all driven, strong, hardworking people-Americans-with genuine and legitimate reasons to feel and believe the way we do. Lets get some real dialog going here, start looking each other in the eyes as fellow human beings, and start getting some real work done, real progress, real answers, not right, not left, or we’re all just going to keep fighting and nothing will ever change, either way.


  1. N.O.W. Endorses Jerry Brown The Day After His Campaign Calls Meg Whitman A Whore | Liberty Pundits Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: