Skip to content

Re-named: The Creep Show with David Letterman

October 5, 2009
Courtesy of

Courtesy of

Dear David Letterman:

Please, stop talking. Now. You are even creepier than Sanford.  At least he’s merely pathetic and sad.  You are just dirty old man creepy.

Plus, while Governor Sanford is an Emo chick with a chattering problem, he has actually accomplished some things in the recent past.  You, on the other hand, haven’t even been funny since 1989.

I simply picture Sanford listening to REM “Everybody Hurts” over and over on a loop whilst scrawling frantically in his tear-stained diary.  Letterman? I hear a creepy “Hee-HEE” in my head and picture things best left unsaid. If only I could leave them unseen by my mind’s eye as well.  It may call for copious amounts of alcohol.

While the revelations were HE-Larious at first, due mostly to the hypocritical nature and the fact that Letterman is an uber-tool, now it is turning into WAY too much information. It’s not as much fun being a voyeur when the subject is grossly disturbing.  And not in the good way.

I did still giggle when I saw this article that the Union Leader re-printted from March 2004 to cash in on one of Dave’s chippie’s 15 minutes of fame. Sadly, Letterman endeavored to give her more than that and subjected his audience to her talents. Or rather, lack thereof..

(CONTINUED next page)


Pages: 1 2

28 Comments leave one →
  1. Paul permalink
    October 5, 2009 10:45 pm

    Letterman is fine; he never was the “Family Values” type. Yes, he probably cheated on his girlfriend now wife. But at least he does go around claiming he is Mr. “Family Values” like some of our politicians (can you just see the grin on all “Fake News” reporters/ commentators and the Palin fringe). This has been a tough summer, for Dave, for our economy but at least he did not end up on the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Sanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC).

    • snarkandboobs permalink*
      October 5, 2009 10:51 pm

      Y’all *really* need to work on your talking points. And y’all need to stop sharing one brain (or what passes for one)

      SAME COMMENT on every blog/news article about David Letterman. Must be nice having all that spare time living in Mommy’s basement !

      Ever hear of Google?

      • Wsorrian permalink
        October 6, 2009 1:35 am

        Google: “democrat sex scandals” Hits = 1,520,000
        Google: “republican sex scandals” Hits = 813,000

        These people look like the hypocrites they accuse us of everytime they open their mouths about these kinds of scandals.

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 6, 2009 1:30 am

      Yeah so you jump all over a Republican for not living up to the morals he professes, yet neglect the fact that he at least had a moral compass. Whereas the leftards continually live in an immoral universe with no repercussions for ever doing anything wrong. When a republican falters he is berated by both parties. When a democrat does the same, he gets the “he had it rough, let’s cut him some slack” treatment. You morons have even tried to get a child molester freed because he was director.

      That shouldn’t surprise me since you have a pervert working in the Whitehouse right now:

      Conservatives walk a line so thin you libots can’t even see it, but you better believe you’ll be there like a venomous spider waiting for a meal should one of us fall off of it. You idiots are pathetic.

  2. snarkandboobs permalink*
    October 5, 2009 11:40 pm

    Also, why does Letterman need to apologize to his wife ON AIR?

    Can’t he just meet her to say Sorry in person? Have some nice quiet conversation and some video tape viewing in his Sex Bunker?

  3. Paul permalink
    October 6, 2009 1:13 pm

    I believe that the American people can see the distinction between a Late Night jokester and a Politician who preaches one thing and lives another. And I also believe that the American people will have more compassionate about this situation, but who knows what the court case will reveal. Let’s remember “Those who are not willing to give pardon and mercy are those that do not need pardon and mercy. By the way, who are you losers to cast stones?

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 6, 2009 2:25 pm

      You’re absolutely correct. The American people can see the difference between a late night jokester who condones child rape and a politican who tried to walk a moral path but failed.

      Yes they are compassionate enough to forgive those who transgress and are truly repentant.

      “”””Those who are not willing to give pardon and mercy are those that do not need pardon and mercy. By the way, who are you losers to cast stones?””””

      So what your saying here is you were a hypocrite for ever judging those republicans you mentioned? Your saying you were completley out of line for skewering Mark Sanford no more than a year after the John Edwards scandal? Way to fall on your own grenade moron.

      What an idiot.

    • Reiuxcat permalink
      October 6, 2009 11:29 pm

      Geez Paul, what part of breaking the law, aka sexual harassment, don’t you understand? Oh that’s right, at least she wasn’t 13. Oops, sorry, so many leftest sexual perverts with their sycophantic apologists coming to light it is difficult to keep them separate.

  4. Althing79 permalink
    October 6, 2009 2:08 pm

    It’s easy to cast stones to morons like you, Paul. Your clear contempt for proper grammar pins the real “loser” tag on you. If you want to be a big celebrity and “cast stones” at good people like, say Sarah Palin, then your gap-toothed moronic butt SHOULD be prone to as many rocks as people can cast at you when you screw up and show what a valueless piece of garbage that you truly are. Defending anybody for infidelity shows your complete lack of morals. Is your name on the Free Polanski petition too?

  5. Wsorrian permalink
    October 6, 2009 4:04 pm

    Speaking of creepy:

  6. bustoff permalink
    October 6, 2009 4:30 pm

    This is a workplace environment we are talking about. Letterman gets paid to make jokes, but I can’t imagine that CBS thinks any of this is funny. The exchange of sexual favors for workplace rewards is the very definition of Sexual Harassment. He’s getting laid, at work, on the job, in his own personal “love nest” right above his office, for cryin’ out loud! Does anyone wonder what happened to the women on the Letterman set who refused to sleep with him? This guy is a straight-up lecher.

  7. October 6, 2009 8:11 pm

    Funny blog. The comparison to Sanford is fantanstic. And Letterman IS worse in every way.


  8. 1MadJack permalink
    October 6, 2009 10:19 pm

    Lori, you’re doing something right. 😉 The leftloons are coming here to attack and defend the low-life scumbag Letterman. 🙄 Letterman has no high moral standards. He simply attacks those that do. Simply another lame liberal entertainer that thinks his opinion matters.

  9. October 7, 2009 12:53 am


    Are you the same guy who dropped a similar comment on a John Edwards article we had up?

    “You got anything you can bring us up to date on about John Ensign, Diaper Dave Vitter, or Mark Sanford?”

    You can tell me. I don’t mind that you’re out on another blog dropping unprotected comments.

    I understand.
    You got a million of them.


  10. October 7, 2009 6:09 am

    I found your article quite useful and interesting. I have bookmarked the site for later usage. Peter

  11. snarkandboobs permalink*
    October 7, 2009 4:32 pm

    Oh, thank y’all so much! Had a super-hectic day yesterday, didn’t get a chance to pop in for commenting, but y’all had it covered for me. Thank you so much!

    And very well said, all. I don’t even have anything to add in response to Paul. You covered it beautifully!

    Now, if only *I* could cover my mind’s eye so that it will stop seeing Letterman’s “sex bunker”. Oh, so icky.

  12. Paul permalink
    October 7, 2009 8:19 pm

    I believe that the American people will have more compassionate than all the Republican social conservatives. Lets face it all Letterman was doing is what Levi Johnston was doing except that Bristol Palin got pregnant (birth control apparently was not discussed). Just because Sarah Palin tried to confuse people by saying that Letterman was referring to her youngest daughter, well we all know that was a lie.

    By the way I said “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” i.e., “Current Events”, but since you brought I know more people did not vote your way not because of the 2009 boys but because of Republican Senator Larry Craig (IA) and Representative, Mark Foley (FL), or what people remember of them “bathrooms and (underage) male interns”.

    I guess sexual harassment suit can be filed (I have not heard of one) but until then, who cares what consenting adults do. We all know that there are laws for regular folks and laws for those who have influence and power. Kinda like the military they all get different spanks for different ranks.

    I only wonder do all of you practice what you preach or have you been part of another “summer of love” List. Take care, had fun hear. Live the dream.

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 8, 2009 5:44 am

      No Paul, you moron. It is not the same as Bristol and Levi. I know you have lost the discriminate part of the rational mind due to years of severe indoctrination (or chewing power cables, snorting clorox, mental retardation, etc.), but there is a huge difference between teenagers letting hormones get the best of them, and a creepy old man having sex with his underlings. Letterman was in a position of power or control over the staffers meaning his advances, while disgustingly vile to start, were also illegal and far more immoral.

      And just what do you consider the American people? Is it the 40% that are conservative? Or the 35% that are moderate? Or the 21% that are idiots…err…I mean liberals? Are you even an American? In case you were unaware of the oozing facetiousness, these were rhetorical questions. I do not want your reponse much less care about it.

      The joke about Palin’s daughter was most certainly directed at the 14 year old. Letterman knew which daughter she took to the game. If you believe otherwise then you are extremely gullible to buy his excuse, willfully ignorant, or complicit with him. Even if it were the 18 year old daughter, the egregious nature of the words are not diminished. You simply do not cross that line and make sexual jokes about someone’s wife, mother, daughter, sister, or any female family member. Or is that moral statute too complex to follow for you and Letterman?

      Your second paragraph smacks of….what’s the word the left always uses to stifle debate??? Oh yeah! Homophobia! Why are you gay bashing, Paul? I thought, from listening to years of whining from California, that gays were people and deserved our respect (and apparently they deserve our children as well, if you listen to them talk these days).

      Your biased limiting of “current events” is typical of those who are lacking in intellectual fortitude. You attempt to restrict the discussion to 2009 as a way to hide the greater transgressions of your peers to seem, somehow, to be holding the superior argument. You failed. Democrats (liberal ones anyay) have always been the more morally bankrupt of politicians. You can’t hide that.

      Your third paragraph is just inane garbage showing your clearly negligent to logic. Or allergic. You choose.

      Yes addlepate, we do practice what we preach. Some of us have erred and came over to the conservative side after wandering aimlessly with no clear ideology to guide us or follow. Some have always been conservatives but have faltered only to strengthen their resolve and cement their moral center*. What moral code do you follow?

      You see, imbecile, we understand your leftist dogma and it’s talking points. They were taught to you by Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, et al. We got it, isolate someone, hold them to every single tenet of their value system, and WHEN they fail start shouting how they, and all others like them are wrong and always wrong because someone failed once upon a time. It’s nothing new. Divide and conquer. Alinsky stole the idea because like all leftists radicals, they aren’t pioneers. They pervert ideas and imploy them juxtaposed to the original intent. They groupthink. They fear individualism. Simply because the individual can’t be divided and conquered so easily.

      We also know how to render it useless now that the light has been cast upon your ridiculously inverted thinking. As much of a worm as Alinsky was, he wasn’t entirely stupid. Close, but not entirely. He knew the liberal thought process was severely flawed and had to be hidden away by constant ridicule and ad hominem attacks to deflect scrutiny from your ideals. That no longer works. We took your sword and cast it into the ocean.

      Nihil ad rem. Congratulations on your acceptance to irrelevancy.

      *Note: A moral center is that which liberals lack as evidenced by the defense of child molesters, abortion, christophobic people, anti-semites, violent criminals, jihadists, eco-terrorists, democrat adulterers, union thugs, tax cheating democrats, criminal enterprises, communists, and all other unspecified moonbats.

  13. Paul permalink
    October 7, 2009 11:09 pm

    You might take a look at this page for reflection:

  14. Paul permalink
    October 8, 2009 12:22 pm

    Wsorrian: If you guys are so holy, then why did you lose the election, one word, Hypocrisy. Or could it be God is not on your side anymore? You are just human not “God like”. I real doubt that Jesus would be on your side casting stones because you think you are so much better, so holy. The best thing hear is that you real believe you are better, how tragic.

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 8, 2009 3:29 pm

      Oh there it is. The “we won” and “conservatives think they’re God” retorts. Funny. Nothing I said alludes to that, but since you saw your idealism get crushed and I didn’t mention a black guy, you had no other argument.

      Poor Paul. Let me explain something to you in very simple terms. People who try to live by a moral doctrine ARE BETTER that those who don’t. This is what leads “your kind” to defend all the evil actions in this world. Your thought process is stunted, inevitably leading you to the wrong conclusions.

      If you don’t think those who live by morality are better, then prove it. I’d like to see your rationale for that.

      Just so you know, idiot. I am not a Christian, nor am I Jewish. I am not religious at all. So stop assuming as such. I just know good people when I see them, no matter what slanderous propaganda the left comes up with.

      • snarkandboobs permalink*
        October 8, 2009 5:13 pm

        Just wanted to say Thank you, for making such great points and making them so well. You rock. For realsies!

        That is all.

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 8, 2009 3:37 pm

      By the way, conservatives, as you erroneously define them, did not lose the election. The neoconservative McCain lost the election. This ethereal “hypocrisy” you speak of, never was an issue. It was all revenge against Bush, Obama lying about his true plans, white guilt, and a repulsion to this “reach across the aisle” mentality that cost McCain votes.

      Perhaps you should learn what you are talking about before you open your mouth. You’ve been wrong about everything and demonstrably so.

  15. Paul permalink
    October 9, 2009 1:14 pm

    Wsorrian (or am I speaking to one person): Thanks for the laughs, I real enjoy hearing your rants, thing is Letterman will stay and be remembered fondly (by the majority), you not so much. Take care, live the dream.

    You might take a look at this page for reflection (you real need it):

    • Wsorrian permalink
      October 9, 2009 4:35 pm

      Laugh all you want. It isn’t funny. You’re just being arrogant and dismissive. That’s indicitive of your lack of morals. People like you laugh of serious subjects as though they don’t matter.

      By the way, I’ve read that OPINION article and it’s complete bull. Much like everything you’ve said here.

      You are a pathetic mass of contradictions and fallacies. I imagine you have few friends.


  1. Twitter Trackbacks for Re-named: The Creep Show with David Letterman « Snark And Boobs [] on
  2. Rather amusing snark » The Anchoress | A First Things Blog
  3. Letterman Sex Tape: Oh, The Humanity « Snark And Boobs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: